Search for: "Barr v. U.s.*"
Results 1 - 20
of 268
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 8:05 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:00 pm
Barr, 589 U.S. 221 (2020), to review of the cancellation hardship standard. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
Under Lorillard v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
" Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
(This argument is also threaded throughout Part I of the Meese/Mukasey/Barr/Calabresi/Lawson brief. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
In the November 7 oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 11:56 am
Barr, 140 S. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:46 am
In the 2012 United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:42 pm
Additional evidence on that point comes from his Attorney General, William Barr, who discussed the election with Trump extensively at the time, and recalls that "he knew well he lost the election. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Bill Barr testified, “everyone understood for weeks that that was going to be what happened on election night. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
Attorney Barbara McQuade, who published a model prosecution memo over a year ago on which we build.[14] Most recently, the consensus has been joined by Trump’s own former attorney general and one-time defender, Bill Barr,[15] and eminent conservative jurist Judge Michael Luttig.[16] A series of rare convictions of some of the leading insurrectionists under the charge of seditious conspiracy have now laid the groundwork for closely related insurrection charges against Trump. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
Barr, the D.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am
The very first sentence of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:41 am
Barr (7th Cir. 2019) (Barrett, J. dissenting), abrogated by Bruen, 142 S. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 9:18 pm
See Kanter v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 12:06 pm
See Bivens v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 11:36 am
Barr, 971 F.3d 96, 99 (2d Cir. 2020). [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 7:22 pm
Last month, in United States v. [read post]
