Search for: "Barrett v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,041
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
Eric Feigin, arguing for the United States as amicus, appeared to acknowledge this point when he said that there is a “chicken-and-egg problem,” because expert opinions will be aware of the Court’s decisions. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
United States, litigants have also asked the Court to find presidential removal powers and immunities that lack an explicit basis in the Constitution’s text. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
In 2016, South Carolina reelected Republican Tim Scott to the United States Senate; Scott is the first black senator from the South since Reconstruction. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
United States, litigants have also asked the Court to find presidential removal powers and immunities that lack an explicit basis in the Constitution’s text. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
In Sohm v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Almost 30 years ago, SCOTUS issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
Barrett Financial * 512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership Dispute–Shande v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:26 pm
United States (June 2023) was asked to review the issue again. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
United States immunity case arguments. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:35 pm
This clause states, in part, “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Justice Barrett observes that immunity will protect the ex-President in his state court cases — where it is especially needed:Let me ask you about state prosecutions because, if the president has some kind of immunity that's implicit in Article II then that immunity would protect him in -- from state prosecutions as well. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
” Michael Dreeben argues for the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
S. 825 and Dolan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Justice Barrett, writing for the Court, noted that the Court’s state action jurisprudence has largely focused upon “whether a nominally private person has engaged in state action,” not whether a state official had acted as a private citizen rather than a state actor. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
McCraw, also known as United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
