Search for: "Bayer v. Bayer" Results 1 - 20 of 1,118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am by admin
Last week, Bayer broke its Philadelphia losing streak, with a win in Kline v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
Supp. 2d 977, 1001 (D.Minn. 2007) (holding expert witness to have exceeded proper proffer “to the extent that he speculates as to Bayer’s motive, intent, or state of mind”); 532 F. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc   New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:16 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
However, the FMC had doubts as to whether this strict liability standard was in line with article 9(7) of Directive 2004/48/EC, as interpreted by the CJEU in its judgment of 12 September 2019 (case C-688/17 Bayer Pharma and Richter Gedeon). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:29 am by Rose Hughes
 Further readingSecond medical use dosage regimen claim successfully traverses both insufficiency and "obvious-to-try" attacks (T 0799/16) (March 2021)Bayer v Teva: Drug patent found "the result of standard and routine considerations" ([2021] EWHC 2690 (Pat)) (Dec 2021)Updated EPO Guidelines 2019: A novel selected sub-range is no longer required to be a “purposive selection” (Oct 2019)Gold Standard test for novelty reigns supreme, even… [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Employee terminated following failure to comply with vaccination policy In the case of Maalouf v. [read post]
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:00 am
On Friday, June 16, 2023, I (sort of) lost my bet that the Supreme Court would follow the path charted in Borzilleri v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm by Chijioke Okorie
This was the key question before South Africa's apex court, the Constitutional Court in Villa Crop Protection (Pty) Ltd v Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH decided in December 2022. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
Villa Crop sought to allege that in breach of its duty as a patentee, Bayer made statements in European countries (ECs) that are in direct contradiction to the case advanced in its (Bayer’s) infringement proceedings. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
On 9 November 2022 there were hearings in the cases of Sharif v Associated Newspapers Limited and LCG and others v OVD and others. [read post]