Search for: "Beach v. Planning & Zoning Commission"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
Marina Coast Water District v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:28 pm
Ocean Bay Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am
” The Court further explained that, unlike the position of responsible agency occupied by the Coastal Commission in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:52 am
California Coastal Com. (2019) 40 Cal.App.5th 563, 577, fn. 8; La Costa Beach Homeowners’ Assn. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 5:16 pm
Protect and Preserve Kahoma AHUPUA’A Assoc. v Maui Planning Commission, 2021 WL 2451978 (HI 6/16/2021) [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 8:10 am
In the 1948 case Morgan v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
By William Abbott and Jessica Melms Redondo Beach Waterfront, LLC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm
Citizens for a Responsible Caltrans Decision v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Zoning ordinances changes are not automatically a CEQA project. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Solano County Airport Land Use Commission (2007) 41 Cal.4th 372, 382. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Solano County Airport Land Use Commission (2007) 41 Cal.4th 372, 382. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:13 am
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has provided a model form and accompanying instructions for firm privacy policies. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
These plans required no zoning variances and did not affect the City of Los Angeles’s (“L.A. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
These plans required no zoning variances and did not affect the City of Los Angeles’s (“L.A. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
The Court examined the plain language of the mini-dorm ordinance and held that the Planning Commission crafted the ordinance to be interpreted as broadly as possible. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:56 am
The appeal was heard before the Commission and varying opinions regarding the plan were once again addressed. [read post]