Search for: "Begum v. Begum"
Results 1 - 20
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am
Further, in R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15, the House of Lords had held that there had been no limitation placed by a school on the freedom of a female Muslim pupil when it refused to allow her to manifest her religious beliefs by wearing the jilbab coat because the uniform policy of the school did not permit it [145]. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 1:24 am
Individuals and local communities from foreign jurisdictions secured favourable outcomes and won jurisdictional battles in the English courts over the last years in several notable cases, including Lungowe v Vedanta, Okpabi v Shell and Begum v Maran. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 2:57 am
Begum v Maran (UK) Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 326 Mr Mollah had fallen to his death whilst working on the demolition of a defunct oil tanker in a shipyard in Bangladesh. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 5:59 am
Parachini The Just Security Podcast: United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:01 am
Even Begum, who lives in al-Roj camp, claims to fear the group’s hardline female fighters. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
A major political controversy ensued in the U.K., with widespread condemnation of her statements, culminating in the government depriving Begum of her British nationality. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm
As mentioned above, on the same day there was a statement in open court in the case of Begum Liza Shahinur v BBC before Heather Williams J. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
On 9 June 2022, the trial of preliminary issues in the case of The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers was held before Nicklin J. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:06 am
Ground 4 Mr Crosland submitted that pursuant to the Attorney General’s obligations of disclosure under Article 6 ECHR and s 3 of the Criminal Procedure Investigations Act 1997, Mr Crosland should have been given information about an alleged breach of the embargo on court judgments in the case of Begum v Special Immigration Appeals Commission [2020] EWCA Civ 918. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 10:55 am
I consider them to demonstrate a process prohibited by Fahia as confirmed in Begum. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 1:21 pm
In my judgment the reasoning of the House of Lords in Fahia (R v Harrow LBC, ex p Fahia(1998) 1 WLR 1396, HL) provides no basis for that contention, nor did the Court of Appeal in Begum (R. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 3:42 am
In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court relied heavily on its judgment in Vedanta Resources PLC and Anor v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 10:45 am
Opportunities:Survey: 2021 Appeal for information: COVID-19 and Statelessness [access]- Please submit responses by 15 March 2021.Call for applications: ISI Statelessness Summer Course, 12-23 July 2021 [info]- Apply by 11 April 2021.Call for applications: 1st Online Course on Statelessness, 21 June-16 July 2021 [info]- Apply by 17 May 2021.Blog posts:Critical sociolinguistic ethnography as a lens to statelessness: a case from the Bidoon community in Kuwait (Critical Statelessness Studies… [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 1:45 am
Ms Begum now wishes to return to the UK. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
On Friday 26 February, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in R (on the application of Begum) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor… [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 7:03 am
In the case of Begum v Tower Hamlets (2005) 1 WLR 2103, Neuberger LJ (as he then was) said that an authority could only reject a second or subsequent application which was based on exactly the same facts as the previous application. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor… [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor… [read post]
