Search for: "Bell v. Black*" Results 1 - 20 of 473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
During his tenure, the Commission adopted a very significant and impactful regulation — rule 146 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).[1] If rule 146 does not ring a bell, do not worry. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Bell was his worst decision. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:41 am by Alex Phipps
The court explained that normally, an appeal removes the jurisdiction of the trial court, but there is an exception under Bell v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
There was also a case management hearing before Nicklin J in the case of Daedone v BBC. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
., 2014[19]2013 103 Strawberries (frozen)Other frozen berries may have been involvedDenmark, Finland, Norway, SwedenSuspected Egypt and Morocco based on virus strain and import historyUnknown, some cases matched the strain of the larger 2013 European outbreak (see below)Nordic Outbreak Investigation Team, 2013[20]20131589Berries (frozen)Italy (90% of cases), Austria, Bulgaria, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, SwedenMultiple food items… [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:10 am by Tess Bridgeman
Just Security is delighted to announce the release of the first book in our partnership with Oxford University Press (OUP), Race and National Security, edited by Matiangai V. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:24 am by centerforartlaw
In this 1920s case, an art expert told a newspaper that a painting an owner claimed was La Belle Ferronnière was inauthentic, cratering its potential resale price, and a lawsuit was filed against the expert.[19] A more contemporary example is Thompson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm by centerforartlaw
In this 1920s case, an art expert told a newspaper that a painting an owner claimed was La Belle Ferronnière was inauthentic, cratering its potential resale price, and a lawsuit was filed against the expert.[19] A more contemporary example is Thompson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]