Search for: "Bell v. Department of Revenue"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
S. ___, 141 S.Ct. 1220 (2021); see, Bernard Bell, A Little Blue Birdie Told Me: Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:34 am
Access Copyright and the SOCAN v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
Bell, Legislative History Without Legislative Intent: The Public Justification Approach to Statutory Interpretation, 60 OHIO ST. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Bell, On the Waterfront: Can Compact Agencies Sue A Signatory States? [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
Bell Atl. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
See, Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
In Salzberg v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:57 pm
Filed in 1974, US v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 2:37 pm
The 2nd DCA concluded that the legislature could not substantively alter or materially limit the class of individuals eligible for the exemption under the plain language of the constitution.Department of Revenue v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm
Bell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am
Montana Department of Revenue, “raises an issue the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
Plaintiffs request that the Court take judicial notice of various documents related to litigation in Washington and Delaware, unpublished cases, and a page from the Washington Department of Revenue website. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 4:01 am
En l’espèce, le caractère véritable de la disposition provinciale est de forcer les FSI à bloquer les sites de JHA que Loto-Québec estime illégaux, et ce, afin d’augmenter les revenus de la province. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Levy limits constrain overall revenue growth, though allow both rates and individual homeowners’ tax liability to change within this aggregate constraint. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
In SOCAN v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:51 pm
LIRC (Beres), Appeal No. 2016AP1365, and Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:46 pm
LIRC (Beres), Appeal No. 2016AP1365, and Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:30 am
Bell Canada, 2017 FC 6 https://t.co/Z80SOcWu44 -> Big win for Bell in major patent case, Mediatube Corp. v. [read post]
