Search for: "Bellamy v. Law"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 11:26 am
A year later, a College Park woman’s murder investigation led officers to suspect that the last […] The post VAUGHN DARVEL BELLAMY v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:22 am
The case for that proposition is Rentas v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 6:41 am
Bellamy v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 7:07 pm
Bellamy. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
Everything that touches Kareem Bellamy’s world seems to turn ugly. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
Colm Ó Cinnéide, Antagonism v Irritation10. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 12:46 pm
Bellamy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:21 am
Bellamy v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
In 1940, the US Supreme Court ruled in Minersville School District v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 9:00 pm
” In Bellamy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:07 am
” Bellamy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm
(The other case of course being IJ's monumental win in Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:56 am
The much hyped case of Fiddes v Channel 4 has this morning reached a surprising conclusion with a short statement in open court. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Policy v New York City Off. of Payroll Admin., 187 AD3d 435, 435 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 36 NY3d 906 [2021]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, 875 [1st Dept 2011], affd 20 NY3d 1028 [2013]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Policy v New York City Off. of Payroll Admin., 187 AD3d 435, 435 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 36 NY3d 906 [2021]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, 875 [1st Dept 2011], affd 20 NY3d 1028 [2013]). [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 12:24 am
Practice point: Pursuant to § 87(2)(f), an agency may deny access to records which, if disclosed, would endanger the life or safety of any person, on a showing of a possibility of endangerment.Student note: Access to government records does not depend on the purpose for which the records are sought.Case: Bellamy v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, the Appellate Division opined that the Fund met its burden of showing a possibility that disclosure of [such] names could endanger the lives or safety of police retirees, as required to exempt them from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(f)". [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, the Appellate Division opined that the Fund met its burden of showing a possibility that disclosure of [such] names could endanger the lives or safety of police retirees, as required to exempt them from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(f)". [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:13 pm
According to Schweikert: Under the landmark Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 8:04 am
Stangenberg v Bellamy Software, 2016 ABQB 160 http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2016/2016abqb160/2016abqb160.pdf … [read post]
