Search for: "Betts v. Betts" Results 1 - 20 of 250
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am by Guest Author
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:58 pm by Aaron Moss
UMG’s executives clearly wanted to stake out a strong position on AI during the company’s quarterly earnings call on Wednesday, but legal battles over AI-generated music won’t be easy, and will make fights over the I-iii-IV-V chord progression look downright quaint by comparison. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:21 pm by Cary Coglianese
Her innovative case study on the Microsoft v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 11:38 am by Scott Bomboy
Betts, extended the actual malice standard to other public figures who were not public officials. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Hugo Black’s unanimous opinion invalidated Betts v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 10:55 am by Giles Peaker
Significantly, Lord Slynn at paragraph 18 of Mohamed  (Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC (2001) UKHL 57 ) re-considered the approach taken to ‘normal residence’ as discussed in R v Barnet London Borough Council, Ex p Nilish Shah (1983) 2 AC 309, 343, upon which Betts was based, and made clear that “the prima facie meaning of normal residence is a place where at the relevant time the person in fact resides…..and it is not appropriate to… [read post]