Search for: "Biondi v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
Group 48, LP v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:22 am
This is a guest post by Professor Andrea Biondi and Michael Bowsher QC, King’s College London, Professor Christopher Yukins, George Washington University Dr Luca Rubini University of Birmingham and PhD candidate Gabriele Carovano, King’s College London. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 5:21 pm
Conversely, Article IX of the Fundamental Law stated: “1. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:19 am
Thus, for example, price discounts aimed at recreating the right balance among spectrum fees are not considered State aid. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Walker, Jr., op. cit., citing Payne v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am
Accordingly, the member states should support the right to education, in particular those facing disadvantages, or having special needs. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:25 am
The Court of Appeal disagreed, stating that the important consideration was not the sufficient British connection between the employer and employee for the purposes of employment law, but rather the connection between the co-workers. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm
I include those who are unemployed because, in most cases, unemployed people are now commonly assumed to be (paid) ‘job-seekers’ and may have certain social welfare entitlements which provide them with the most basic means for survival.[2] These distinctions may seem sharp and clear-cut as stated here. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:00 am
For Part I click here, for Part II click here, for Part III click here, for Part IV click here, for Part V click here, for Part VI click here. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 3:59 am
The terms of the bilateral agreement reached by the United States and Mexico on August 27, 2018, as per public statements released thus far, are summarized in Part V of Whither NAFTA? [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 6:04 am
(Part V: The Mexican Handshake) appeared first on Regulating for Globalization. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:37 am
However, the Supreme Court stated that ‘no single key’ could be determinative of status. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:33 am
In its earlier case law (D and Sweden v Council) on same-sex partnerships, the CJEU already ruled that these could not be equated with marriage. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 am
In the Unites States, a federal judge followed the same line of reasoning in the case Razak v Uber when he decided that Uber drivers are independent contractors because they “work when they want to and are free to nap, run personal errands, or take smoke breaks between trips”. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:10 am
The Implications and Consequences of United Kingdom Exit from the EU by Patrick J Birkinshaw, Andrea Biondi (eds,)€ 125 The post USA: Lyda v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:23 am
Any doubt on this issue is resolved by the CJEU decision in Solvay v Honeywell which provides a clear analogy. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 12:39 am
The Implications and Consequences of United Kingdom Exit from the EU by Patrick J Birkinshaw, Andrea Biondi (eds,)€ 125 The post USA: Wi-Fi One, LLC v. [read post]
