Search for: "Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 252
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 8:05 am
” In this case, the plaintiff was a transgender woman denied coverage under the Houston County Sheriff’s Office health insurance plan (a self-insured plan administered by Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield) for gender-affirming care prescribed for her gender dysphoria diagnosis. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan (Michigan Health Care False Claims Act (HCFCA)) Waukegan Potawatomi Casino, LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 112 F.3d at 872. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
State court analogues to these rules replicated the debate in state courts around the country. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 2015 WL 348620 (E.D. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:41 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Tribal Contract Health; Discovery) United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 2:30 pm
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich., 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016). [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Tribal Contract Health; Discovery) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html In re Delila D. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:27 pm
Additionally, the insurance companies that provided the state with its health benefits plan — UnitedHealthcare and Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield — allegedly warned the state that its plan’s express exclusion for gender-affirming care was discriminatory. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:33 am
Vasso Godiali, a vascular surgeon from Bay City, Michigan, was sentenced to 80 months in prison for orchestrating a multimillion-dollar scheme to defraud health care programs by submitting claims for the placement of vascular stents and for thrombectomies that he did not perform and was ordered to pay $19.5 million in restitution collectively to Medicare, Medicaid, and Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin (7th Cir.1997) (holding that plaintiff's obsessive-compulsive disorder was a "common enough" disorder and not so "shameful" that it warranted anonymity); Doe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm
Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin, 112 F.3d 869, 872 (7th Cir. 1997) ("Should 'John Doe' 's … records contain material that would be highly embarrassing to the average person yet somehow pertinent to this suit and so an appropriate part of the judicial record, the judge could require that this material be placed under seal. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:46 pm
State Conf. of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
Assailed from all quarters for being not tough enough, for being too tough, for being fundamentally misconceived, for threatening freedom of expression, for technological illiteracy, for threatening privacy, for excessive Ministerial powers, or occasionally for the sin of not being some other Bill entirely – and yet enjoying almost universal cross-party Parliamentary support – the UK’s Online Safety Bill is now limping its way through the House of Lords. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
Assailed from all quarters for being not tough enough, for being too tough, for being fundamentally misconceived, for threatening freedom of expression, for technological illiteracy, for threatening privacy, for excessive Ministerial powers, or occasionally for the sin of not being some other Bill entirely – and yet enjoying almost universal cross-party Parliamentary support - the UK’s Online Safety Bill is now limping its way through the House of Lords. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (6th Cir. 2016) (noting that "only the most compelling reasons can justify non-disclosure of judicial records. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]