Search for: "Blue v. Ryan" Results 1 - 20 of 88
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am by Trent Dykes
The Governor has stated that she remains committed to enacting noncompete legislation protecting “middle-class and low-wage earners,” and Senator Sean Ryan, who sponsored SB S3100A, has indicated that noncompete legislation will be reintroduced this year. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 8:38 am by Race to the Bottom
Along with the “blue sky” jurisprudence supporting this proposed definition, the SEC itself, in its briefing to the Supreme Court in SEC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
California – On Heels of Ridley-Thomas Indictment, LA County Hires Firm to Launch Sweeping Audit Los Angeles Daily News – Ryan Carter and City News Service | Published: 2/4/2022 Los Angeles County hired the law firm Covington & Burling to conduct the audit of its contracting policies and processes and review all its major service contracts. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm by sydniemery
Colorado is cited in the following article: Ryan D. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am by Tinker Ready
Ryan Gabrielson ProPublica Originally published at ProPublica January 17 , 2019 At the FBI Laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, a team of about a half-dozen technicians analyzes pictures down to their pixels, trying to determine if the faces, hands, clothes or cars of suspects match images collected by investigators from cameras at crime scenes. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:10 am
October 30, 2018 - 1 PM: Topiclear, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]