Search for: "Blumencranz v Botter"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2021, 4:38 am
Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of her cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint regardless of the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s opposition papers (see Blumencranz v Botter, 182 AD3d 568, 569; see generally Winegrad v New York Univ. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:58 am
The defendants also failed to establish, as a matter of law, that the plaintiffs could not have prevailed in an action against Travco (see Blumencranz v Botter, 182 AD3d 568, 569; see also 83 Willow, LLC v Apollo, 187 AD3d 563, 564). [read post]
26 May 2020, 4:30 am
Here, in Blumencranz v Botter 2020 NY Slip Op 02452 Decided on April 29, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department, against great odds, the motion for summary judgment was denied and affirmed on appeal. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:04 pm
BLUMENCRANZ v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 3:21 am
InBlumencranz v Botter 2012 NY Slip Op 32089(U) July 27, 2012 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 15489/11 Judge: Joel K. [read post]