Search for: "Bottoms v. Commissioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 9:01 pm
”[6] The tone at the top of an audit firm determines whether the culture is focused on delivering high-quality audits or is a profit-center chasing the short-term bottom line, and whether “top management extols the important role audits play in the capital markets” or acts as if audits are little more than compliance “commodities. [read post]
9 May 2024, 12:38 pm
Related Cases: Google v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The bottom line: you must ensure that your representations regarding your use of AI are not materially false or misleading. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:15 am
However, one commissioner dissented, finding that Dr. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
In 2016 the United States Government published its first National Action Plan on Responsible Business Conduct. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during February 2024 Nine consistory court judgments were circulated in 2024 including: Procedure Churchyards and burials Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Also included are: Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; Visitations; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
NetChoice v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
At bottom, ruling in favor of Big Tech in NetChoice would effectively require the Supreme Court to disregard decades of First Amendment precedent and throw asunder legions of well-established antidiscrimination laws. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
In Navroth v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
The bottom line is that the Appointments Clause poses no barrier to privatization or outsourcing. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm
Close followers of the LDT saga in recent years may notice that these rebuttals attempt to address several of the issues raised in a June 22, 2020 memo from the HHS General Counsel to the FDA Commissioner that questioned FDA’s authority to regulate LDTs and supported HHS’s (since rescinded) announcement that FDA would no longer require premarket review for LDTs absent notice-and-comment rulemaking. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue: The main interest asserted by Minnesota in this case is the raising of revenue. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:57 am
The case is Hernandez v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
One major concern we have raised within this debate is that, when seeking to harmonize safeguards, there is a race to the bottom of human rights protections. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
One major concern we have raised within this debate is that, when seeking to harmonize safeguards, there is a race to the bottom of human rights protections. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
She appealed, and in Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89 the Appeal Tribunal ruled in her favour, at least provisionally. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:37 am
Travis v. [read post]
