Search for: "Bounds v. Commonwealth" Results 1 - 20 of 244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Sara Notario
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm by Jeanne Huang
The passengers (supported by the Commonwealth Attorney-General and ACCC, as interveners) took a different starting point — the threshold question is whether the forum law, as a matter of interpretation, applies to the contract irrespective of the parties’ usage of an exclusive jurisdiction clause. [read post]
For example, members of the United Services Union of New South Wales have voted in favour of a new Local Government (State) Award 2023, which incorporates the right to disconnect within its overtime provisions.[10] The Finance Sector Union (FSU) is currently pursuing what it describes as an ‘ambitious agenda of improvements’ during bargaining negotiations with the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, including that employees be assured of their right to disconnect at the conclusion… [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Marc DeGirolami
We expect students to do business in the proper currency of intellectual discourse—a currency consisting of reasons, evidence, and arguments—but no ideas or positions are out of bounds. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
That article is cited in the Justice Gorsuch's dissent in Oklahoma v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
States in the latter category must be careful of attempting to stretch their statute's similarity to defamation law too far, as the Commonwealth of Massachusetts did in [Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 10:12 am by Eugene Volokh
Accordingly, "a litigant is generally prevented from invoking the preclusive force of a judgment unless he would have been bound had the prior litigation of the issue reached the opposite result. [read post]