Search for: "Brett Large" Results 1 - 20 of 1,142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm by Ronald Mann
” Second, and more pointedly, Justice Amy Coney Barrett (joined in large part by Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson) wrote to explain her position that it was “wrong twice over” to argue that “history and tradition” alone can “settle the constitutionality of the names clause. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 12:16 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
And here is from the paper's conclusion: The literature on the impact of government regulation has largely focused on whether it benefits or harms social welfare. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Brett Kappel, an attorney who focuses on campaign fiancé, lobbying, and government ethics law cases, said it is not unusual to see a super PAC terminate itself after paying a significant FEC penalty. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In an opinion of the Court for himself and six other Justices (Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Barrett, and Ketanji Jackson), Justice Clarence Thomas explained that: Under the Appropriations Clause, an appropriation is simply a law that authorizes expenditures from a specified source of public money for designated purposes. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:00 pm by Brett Trout
 This damning testimony likely led to the large punitive damage awards. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:46 am by Marcia Coyle
" The first wave of decisions in this term and in most terms, has largely been by unanimous votes. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am by Evangelina Cantu
 More specifically, the rules: Strengthen EPA methane emission regulations for new, modified, and reconstructed oil and gas operations, including: Adding control requirements for certain oil and gas emissions sources; Setting new fugitive emissions monitoring requirements for well sites and other emissions sources; and Eliminating routine flaring of natural gas; For the first time, regulates methane emissions from existing oil and gas infrastructure that pre-dates the EPA’s oil… [read post]
7 May 2024, 3:05 pm by John Floyd
  By the time law enforcement arrived on the scene of the protest on the night of April 31, large bands of aggressive, pro-Israel counter-protesters were at the scene. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:30 am by jonathanturley
” One of Columbia’s centers publicly complained when Justice Brett Kavanaugh was allowed to speak on campus. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The public show of support for Cruz does not violate the law, but it could raise the appearance of bias by a government regulator, campaign finance lawyer Brett Kappel said. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm by Amy Howe
At the oral argument on Monday, the court’s liberal justices largely seemed to agree. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:17 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Circuit Court of Appeals made up of three appointees of then-President Donald Trump largely upheld O’Connor’s ruling. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
That brings us to our next issue, raised by a large group of Florida criminal cases that the court has had kicking around since November. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
[Justice Kavanaugh laid out a unifying theory for the Shadow Docket.] [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:27 am by Beatrice Yahia
Brett Murphy reports for Propublica. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm by Ronald Mann
” He then noted that the court’s most recent decision in the area (involving baggage handlers for Southwest Airlines) “expressly declined to adopt an ‘industry-wide’ approach of the sort [the employers] advance here,” largely because the statute’s “language focuses on the performance of work rather than the industry of the employer. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm by Ilya Somin
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a concurring opinion joined by Justice Kagan and Justice Jackson. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:56 am by Amy Howe
” But in a one-paragraph opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh – joined by Jackson and Justice Elena Kagan – wrote separately to stress that the court had “explicitly decline[d] to decide” the question flagged by Gorsuch in his concurring opinion. [read post]