Search for: "Brigham v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2024, 3:30 pm
It was in response to the Supreme Court decision Kelo v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
James Heilpern (Brigham Young University - J. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm
Retirements -- Several Ombuds announced their retirements last year, including:Jim Augustine, University of South CarolinaPaul Kuerbis, Colorado CollegeCraig Mousin, DePaul UniversityMerle Waxman, Yale University (2022) In Memoriam -- Colleagues remembered many Ombuds, including a beloved current and upcoming Ombuds, who passed away in 2023: Mary Childers, retired inaugural Ombuds at Dartmouth CollegeJanet Eckhouse, retired Health Care Ombuds Mediator at Kaiser PermanenteCurtis Grassman, retired… [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:43 am
Supreme Court to brief and argue Collins v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
Nourse, Ralph V. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
It will then treat the two (or more) people as a unit and treat the unit differently from how it would treat those same people individually. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:05 am
Based on precedent set by cases like Kelly v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:55 am
United States, concerning interpretation of the First Step Act. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 4:05 pm
In Pollock v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Krauss, New Light on the History of Free Exercise Exemptions: The Debates in Two Eighteenth-Century State Legislatures, (Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2022).Luke Boso, Religious Liberty, Discriminatory Intent, and the Status Quo Constitution, (Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper , Jan. 2023).Enrico Bonadio, Krishna Ravi Srinivas, Balaji Parthasarathy Iyengar & Atreya Choudhary, Gandhian Philosophy and Indian Intellectual Property, (in Relevance of… [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
Constitution vests the executive power in a President of the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 10:50 am
Hassid, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a California state regulation granting labor organizations a limited “right to take access” to agricultural employers’ property constitutes a per se physical taking. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
Jackson Lecturer on the Supreme Court of the United States at the Chautauqua Institution. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 8:55 am
Hassid, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a California state regulation granting labor organizations a limited “right to take access” to agricultural employers’ property constitutes a per se physical taking. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 9:28 am
United States and cited corpus-based scholarship in another case. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm
Because the United States dispossessed Native people of their ancestral homelands, the federal government now controls many sacred sites. [read post]
