Search for: "Brooks v. May et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The Commissioner may accept additional evidence “upon good cause shown and such terms and conditions as the commissioner may specify” (8 NYCRR 276.5). [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The Commissioner may accept additional evidence “upon good cause shown and such terms and conditions as the commissioner may specify” (8 NYCRR 276.5). [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
And it is true that many practical advantages may follow from this statement of purpose. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am
Research Methodology Much of the data and analysis presented in the article by Barrero et al., are taken from the authors’ own study, the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The ABA Business Law Section Backgrounder may be accessed HERE. 1UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMANORTHEASTERN DIVISIONNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS )UNITED, d/b/a the NATIONAL )SMALL BUSINESS )ASSOCIATION, et al., ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB)JANET YELLEN, in her official )capacity as Secretary of the )Treasury, et al., ))Defendants. )MEMORANDUM OPINIONThe late Justice Antonin Scalia once remarked that federal… [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:36 am
“Beginning in October 2014, Plaintiff retained Cervini to represent him in an actioncaptioned Philip Servinder et al v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:32 am
Other pre-ChatGPT work on patents and AI that I found helpful include articles by Ryan Abbott (the "everything is obvious" concern), Liza Vertinsky (introducing "M/PHOSITA" for obviousness that takes into account machine as well as human skill in the art), Dennis Crouch (assessing patentability of AI-generated inventions through lens of corporate ownership and copyright work for hire doctrine), Keith Robinson (enablement issues raised by… [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
In Anderson v Anderson, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 8246131, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:40 am
Tempur Sealy International, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
An extraordinary non-O157 outbreak occurred in Germany beginning in May 2011. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
A judge should probe such facts before making a decision on removal.[12] Importantly, the Supreme Court has explained that the evidentiary standard for the defendant may be higher in criminal cases of removal “because of the more compelling state interest in conducting criminal trials in the state court. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Mo Brooks, January 6, and the Effort to Overturn an Election, (Nov. 9, 2021) 12. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
An extraordinary non-O157 outbreak occurred in Germany beginning in May 2011. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:00 am
Gabet et al. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 2:22 pm
Gabet et al. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:53 am
American Civil Liberties Union Brandt et al v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 11:16 am
AWGI, LLC et al. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:27 am
Nieves et al. [read post]
