Search for: "Brown v. Bowen"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Hensley v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 738 (1974) (as applied to candidates for President and Congress); Jenness v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 738 (1974) (as applied to candidates for President and Congress); Jenness v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:19 pm
") (emphasis added); see Brown v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
On 22 March 2023, the defendant’s application for summary judgement was dismissed in the case of Frati v Bowen-Carter [2023] EWHC 627 (KB). [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:26 pm
In Summers v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 11:16 am
For more than twenty years, the case of Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 3:00 am
See also Brown v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 3:35 am
Bowen, 194 F. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
Brown, 81 N.C. 568 (1879). [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm
” “Most academic connections are developed along the lines of narrowly defined intellectual interests,” said James V. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 4:45 am
In Brown v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:00 am
James-Bowen & Ors v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard 6-7 Mar 2018. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 10:50 am
Bowen School of Law is proud to present a symposium on the significance of Cooper v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Brown, 124 F.3d 1179, 1183 n. 2 (9th Cir. 1997). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 11:43 am
Stern and Bowen v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am
Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 5:18 am
See Bowen v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
The government and the petitioners yesterday filed their supplemental reply briefs in response to the Court's order. [read post]