Search for: "Brown v. R"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,744
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am
He covered topics like judicial vacancies, the need for Jordan timelines, and disinformation circulated about the Court’s R v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm
In line with previous case law such as In ‘t Veld v Council, the Court required [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hasbrouck, Ernesto R. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hasbrouck, Ernesto R. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Brown, T. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Brown, T. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
This judgment came just a week before the Supreme Court of Canada released a decision on rape myths and stereotypes, in which it reiterated its recognition of the myth of “false allegations of sexual assault based on ulterior motives” (R v Kruk, 2024 SCC 7 (CanLII) at paras 35-37). [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:36 pm
Citing R. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:32 pm
Procuring identity documents is covered under s. 56.1(1) of the Criminal Code found in Part II. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account… [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
President Joseph R. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
Cruz, for example, led the opposition to now-Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court by trying to force her to defend critical race theory. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:14 am
R. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:58 am
Carême v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:35 pm
Unlike Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:18 am
(L to R) Mark Royero (2L); Adam Stolz (coach); Kaitlin Prece (2L); not pictured: Luis Reyes (coach) The Supreme Court of the United States can agree on something: In McElrath v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Where an employer becomes aware that an employee is engaging in time theft, there are several options that may be available: … The CourtR v Bykovets: Police Protocol for Internet Protocol In R v Bykovets, 2024 SCC 6, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) decided that Canadians have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 8:49 am
” In re Marriage of Donald R., 432 Ill. [read post]
