Search for: "Brown v. Shoe" Results 1 - 20 of 237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The FTC recently sued to block Tapestry’s proposed acquisition of Capri, alleging that the effect of the combination of the companies’ handbag brands may be to substantially lessen competition. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am by Guest Author
Thinks of SEC enforcement actions as the opposite of the huge jurisdiction expansion we saw in cases like Brown & Williamson. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:20 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
MICHAEL’S HOT SAUCE 7235126 DAPPER JACKSON 7236817 GRABR 7256237 WAX BARISTA 7239266 GOOD VEGAN BAD VEGAN 7250890 GRIEF STINKS 7254451 THE BADGE SHACK 7255976 RIDGELINE 7250743 OPTAVISE NOW 7247488 AFTERSCHOOL HQ YOUR HOME FOR AFTERSCHOOL EXPERIENCES 7250981 7250982 7243879 LECATOU 7246613 OLD NATIONAL BANCORP 7243094 GUARDIANVIEW 360 7233702 I WANT TO GET OLD 7243404 THE DANGEROUS BUTTERFLY 7234171 LAMBDA CAR CLUB 7240132 POWER JACK 7256228 ENGAME 7252794 MALOMO 7250479 I WANNA SEX YOU UP… [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Jessica Melugin
A fundamental misunderstanding of concentration’s relationship with anti-competitive outcomes became legal precedent with Brown Shoe Co. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron and Laura Dooley
She believed the question of whether Norfolk Southern could be sued in Pennsylvania was controlled by the 1945 case of International Shoe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm by Bona Law PC
New Classic Cases – Brown Shoe One of the most important classic antitrust case is Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Department of Justice Antitrust Division and Federal Trade Commission issued new draft Merger Guidelines on July 19 that aim to significantly increase scrutiny of merger activity. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
Brown argued that the Supreme Court’s decision in International Shoe v Washington, the proper test of jurisdiction is whether the corporation satisfies the minimum contact test. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm by Amy Howe
It argued that a decision from 1945, International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Ornamentality exceptions, like LTTB, versus dog toys & shoes, which are not seen as the same—wrestling with speech v. product v. conduct. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
 See, Kaplan v. [read post]