Search for: "Brown v. Supreme Court of Virginia" Results 1 - 20 of 701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
Wednesday's post, This Crossroads Moment, highlights the central modern question for law and policy: whether to take the final step in the historical sequence from structural sexism to sex skepticism—where the Supreme Court left us in 1996 in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
The defendants in these cases argue that when the Supreme Court held a few years ago in Ramos v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am by Guest Author
Department of Labor); the COVID-19 eviction moratorium (Alabama Ass’n of Realtors); the Clean Power Plan (West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am by Eugene Volokh
District Court opinion, and nine short orders from the Ohio Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” This is precisely what the Supreme Court called for in TSC Industries v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
Disclosure: I did file an amicus brief in support of neither party in this case, and in the court below.On March 4, 2024, the Supreme Court decided Trump v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
Disclosure: I did file an amicus brief in support of neither party in this case, and in the court below.On March 4, 2024, the Supreme Court decided Trump v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
The Appointments Clause provides that the President “shall appoint Ambassadors, other Public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States…. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Cunningham & Ute Römer-Barron, Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine, (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024).Elias Neibart, M.A. v. [read post]