Search for: "Bruce v. Poole"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[19] Reasonableness requires prudence but not perfection.[20] Determining Allocability The term “allocate” means “to assign an item of cost, or a group of items of cost, to one or more cost objectives,” and includes “both direct assignment of cost and the reassignment of a share from an indirect cost pool. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
As well, we are seeing a lot of what Toronto Star columnist Bruce Arthur brilliantly called “crayon law” — nonsense legalese drafted by people who have no clue about basic law. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 1:29 pm
Bruce R. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
Former liberal staffer, Bruce Lehrmann, is set to argue that he delayed starting defamation proceedings against Network Ten and News Corp due to prior legal advice, the ongoing high-profile criminal proceedings against him and his mental health, the Guardian reports. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
The debate will be led by Fiona Bruce MP. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 12:18 pm
Poole, 966 F.3d 145 (2d Cir. 2020), Wandering Dago, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:20 am
“More voting restrictions have been enacted over the last decade than at any point since the end of Jim Crow,” Bruce V. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
McKee v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Gibson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:40 am
The Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, issued an opinion in Tejas Vending, LP, et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm
All of the proxies started dancing (you can find most of them on the venerable Google Shill List from the Oracle v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 6:28 am
Call Associates and Bruce L. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am
Bruce H. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
Bruce Joseph, Wiley Rein LLP: Section 512(a), conduit function—that both retrospectively and prospectively is working right and the balance will continue to be right 20 years from now. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:17 am
Call Associates and Bruce L. [read post]
