Search for: "Bullock v. Price"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2024, 4:09 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:21 am
NPQCarrie Garber Siegrist: New: If #taxexempt org relied on Rev Proc 2018-38 & did not identify its donors on #Form990 #ScheduleB: Penalty relief Notice 2019-47 may help w/ potential sec. 6652(c) penalties due to 7/30/19 Bullock v @IRSnews order setting aside 2018-38. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:00 am
Both Uber and Lyft will implement programs that offer shares to drivers, with Uber offering the opportunity to buy shares at the initial IPO price to drivers who have made at least 2,500 Uber drives (Bullock, Financial Times).Uber’s bombastic numbers cover up its relatively slow growth rates. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
One of the reasons I attended Grove City is because it was a reasonably-priced liberal arts college with a good reputation. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:15 am
Montana’s contribution limits continue to be contested in the court challenge of Lair v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
The minority position, represented by Conte v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
ELSSCAP also had a cert grant and a 9-0 win recently in Bullock v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Fresh from last year’s exploration in Bullock v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
In Diosdado v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:21 pm
Int’l., Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
(Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps AOL – Patent reexamination games not tolerated in Texas court: Beneficial Innovations v AOL (Patents Post Grant Blog) Apple – ALJ Bullock issues orders on evidentiary motions in Certain Mobile Communications and Computer Devices (337-TA-704) involving Apple and Nokia (ITC Law Blog) Apple – ALJ Gildea denies Apple’s motion to compel in Certain Electronic Devices (337-TA-701) (ITC Law Blog) Cross… [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:32 pm
In my view, that federal decision was probably dictated by the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision upholding economic development takings in Kelo v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:53 am
Fluke also asserts that the defaulting respondents' products are sold at significantly lower prices than Fluke's products. [read post]