Search for: "Bumpus v New York City Tr. Auth."
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
To establish a cause of action based on negligent hiring, retention, supervision, and training of an employee, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the "employer knew or should have known [that] the employee[ ] [had] a propensity for the conduct which caused the [plaintiff's] injury" (Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
To establish a cause of action based on negligent hiring, retention, supervision, and training of an employee, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the "employer knew or should have known [that] the employee[ ] [had] a propensity for the conduct which caused the [plaintiff's] injury" (Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:01 am
“ ’Good cause’ and ‘interest of justice’ are two separate and independent statutory standards” (Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 5:22 am
” Good cause’ and interest of justice’ are two separate and independent statutory standards” (Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
New York City Tr. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:53 am
Bumpus v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:49 am
At least one Appellate Division decision has suggested that good cause is likely to be found where "the plaintiff's failure to timely serve process is a result of circumstances beyond [its] control" (Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:08 am
Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:58 am
Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
