Search for: "Bunch v. Long et al" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Consider: “NO FOIA” In an attempt to withhold a bunch of emails they wanted to hide from the public eye, employees in Augusta County began tagging their messages with “NO FOIA,” as an apparent incantation staff believed could ward off transparency. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Anyway, the now 32-year-old owner of the then-four-month-old penis depicted in the photo has sued Nirvana et al., alleging that the naked baby photo is child pornography. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thomas, Alito, et al that the original (and supposedly widely shared) understanding of some vague constitutional term just happens to align perfectly with the Republican Party's ideological agenda in the 21st century--the Jack Daniel's case is a welcome diversion.At a minimum, the case illustrates that the people who operate Jack Daniel's and/or its corporate overlord Brown-Forman are a bunch of stuffed shirts. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
CMP et al. had no First Amendment right to break the laws they broke. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Endorsement by Monroe means something v. different from endorsement by ABG but courts have refused to distinguish those things. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by David Kopel
Part V addresses three arguments against universal mask wearing. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: Democratic party in the US has changed a bunch in 20 years. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm by Chris Castle
Other relevant reading should include Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale, Andreassen et al (2012). [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 7:35 am by Richard Hunt
J.U.T.A., Inc. et al,  6:17-CV-987ORL40KRS, 2018 WL 1305909 (M.D. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James P. Flynn
Rubin et al., an appellate court in Massachusetts affirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s claims, holding that Agero failed to establish that two of the defendants, Timothy Schneider and Matthew Capozzi, owed Agero a duty of loyalty. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
Rubin et al., an appellate court in Massachusetts affirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s claims, holding that Agero failed to establish that two of the defendants, Timothy Schneider and Matthew Capozzi, owed Agero a duty of loyalty. [read post]