Search for: "Burford v. Burford"
Results 1 - 20
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am
We have been told by many that the $2.2 billion Intel v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 6:01 am
Burford and Carolyn E. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:17 am
., Appellants, v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:17 am
., Appellants, v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:34 am
And even when diversity exists, courts in most if not all eleven federal Circuits routinely abstain from hearing judicial dissolution claims under the Burford abstention doctrine. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:22 am
On July 7, 2022, FINRA’s Office of Hearing Officers issued its decision in Dep’t of Enforcement v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 12:37 am
Court of Appeals in Friedman v Revenue Management, Inc. employed the Burford abstention doctrine to close the courthouse door to judicial dissolution proceedings even where diversity jurisdiction is present. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 1:31 am
Earlier this year the English High Court Relief was granted by the High Court (Akhmedova v Akhmedov and others [2021] EWHC 545 (Fam)). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:10 am
Najjar Group, LLC v West 56th Hotel LLC, recently decided by the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:56 am
Common-Law Dissolution Plaintiff Loses Fight Over Venue Last year I wrote about a federal court’s first-impression decision in Busher v Barry in which it applied the Burford abstention doctrine to dismiss, without prejudice to refiling in state court, the minority shareholders’ claim for common-law dissolution. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
The doctrine is named after Burford v Sun Oil Co., a 1943 decision in which the U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:17 pm
Kim: Revisiting the License v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
On this episode, plaintiffs from the landmark case of Monroe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:12 am
Grace Ranch, LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:12 am
Grace Ranch, LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:30 am
Magarik v Kraus USA, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:47 am
Two of my pet topics — dysfunctional buy-sell agreements and application of federal court abstention doctrine in private company disputes — intersect in a decision issued last month in Ray v Raj Bedi Revocable Trust, Case No. 3:19-CV-711 DRL-MGG [N.D. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:06 am
Busher v Barry The question of first impression was addressed by S.D.N.Y. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am
Roskind v Emigh. [read post]
