Search for: "Burrows v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2022, 4:15 pm
In Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:10 am
My concern is only with how the court got there, as I discuss below.This is all a form of non-literal copying, but the discussion begins with Burrow-Giles Litho. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:31 pm
Burrows for this post. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 6:06 am
Here, the plaintiff’s conclusory allegations were insufficient to state a cause of action alleging violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Klein v Rieff, 135 AD3d 910, 912 [2016]; Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 759 [2014]). [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 5:21 am
" The majority in Miller specifically distinguished that case from the case of Burrows v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1006:Under the Elections Code, a city council facing a qualifying citizen sponsored land use initiative measure is precluded from direct adoption of the measure without first complying with CEQA. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:57 am
The appeal arose out of a writ of mandate case heard before Judge Donald Alvarez of the San Bernardino Superior Court (San Bernardino Superior Court Case CIVSS 810834). [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
Do the rules apply in superior court? [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
Do the rules apply in superior court? [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
