Search for: "Butler v. Supreme Judicial Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
Decided on May 15, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentCOLLEEN D. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
Decided on May 15, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentCOLLEEN D. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
The Supreme Court may not be “composed of wise and sensible jurists. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
” The Supreme Court’s opportunity came with the 2023 decision in Nealy v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Pozen makes the same observation about the modern Supreme Court’s jurisprudence. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
Supreme Court ruled that criminal proceedings must be open to public scrutiny and that civil proceedings were presumptively open. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
In the case of Adkins v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
., appointees in the legislature, such as the Clerk of the House and Secretary of the Senate, and clerks of the federal courts. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In the case of Adkins v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” Post’s brilliant typology reveals that none of the four leading justices on the Taft Court considered themselves originalists or textualists as those terms are used on the Supreme Court today. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
” In one of the best detailed discussions of modern bread and baking regulation that I have ever encountered, Post recounts Justice Butler’s aggressive exercise of judicial notice and ex cathedra reasoning in Jay Burns Baking Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
See, e.g., Lochner v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Bruen, 597 U.S. 1, 36–37 (2022) (Thomas, J., for the majority of the Court); Bostock v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
These decisions, read together with the Supreme Court's false-speech jurisprudence in cases such as United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
In December, the Court granted review in Fischer v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:26 am
Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations and prior Supreme Court precedent in Petrella v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:26 am
Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations and prior Supreme Court precedent in Petrella v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:32 am
John Crace, The Guardian The Home Secretary and the ECHR The Times reports that “Suella Braverman has been authorised by Downing Street to float the prospect of leaving the European Convention on Human Rights as a ‘warning shot’ to the Strasbourg court not to block flights deporting migrants to Rwanda”, in advance of the Supreme Court hearing on the legality of the Government’s policy on shipping asylum seekers to Rwanda. [read post]
