Search for: "Butterworth v. Butterworth" Results 1 - 20 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Sweet and Maxwell and Butterworths, the latter having been born as recently as in 1818, at least to some extent, continue to use their historic names, despite Westlaw, Thomson Reuters, Lexis Nexis and RELX (the world’s largest publisher) and, certainly in their home markets, are still known by them to lawyers, law librarians and others. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:28 am by Laura
  The case, if you want to google it, is James Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm by Michael Douglas
The second ground, that Australia is an inappropriate forum, turns on application of the ‘clearly inappropriate forum’ test of the Australian forum non conveniens doctrine: Chandrasekaran v Navaratnem [2022] NSWSC 346, [5]–[8]; Sapphire Group Pty Ltd v Luxotico HK Ltd [2021] NSWSC 589, [77]–[80]; Studorp Ltd v Robinson [2012] NSWCA 382, [5], [62]. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
They point out that in Bonnick v Morris ([2003] 1 AC 300) the Privy Council took the view that the single meaning rule could not be applied without modification when a court was considering the Reynolds defence and the question of whether a journalist had acted responsibly. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Recently, I had the opportunity to attend an SCC hearing (R v Rafilovich on January 25, 2019) and was amazed to hear the judges and lawyers separately mention or quote the modern principle of statutory interpretation in their arguments, questions, and comments. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:56 am by Daily Record Staff
Civil litigation — Amended complaint — Wrongful discharge This case concerns the discharge of an at-will employee, allegedly because she did not appear for work timely on December 24, 2014, but instead attended a final peace order hearing as a respondent pursuant to § 3-1505 of the Maryland Code’s Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article in ... [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:30 am by Alison Shea
 Guy has presented the BIALL 'Pepper v Hart' training course since it started 21 years ago, and is best placed to do so having assisted Counsel for the case with their research. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:27 am by Jeremy Speres
Just over a year ago, we reported on a rather confusing trade mark infringement and expungement judgement of the Western Cape High Court in Etraction v Tyrecor. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The fourth edition of Duncan and Neill on Defamation, published in the Butterworths Common Law series, is now on sale. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
Daniels Distinguished[T]he Supreme Court in Hyatt discussed possible tension between language in two of its precedents—Butterworth v. [read post]