Search for: "C v. B" Results 1 - 20 of 22,663
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The full media release can be accessed here. 3             The Federal Court finds that a term in Auto & General Insurance Company’s contracts is not unfair On 22 March 2024, the Federal Court in ASIC v Auto & General Insurance Company limited [2024] FCA 272 handed down the first decision to apply the unfair contract terms (UCT) regime in the context of insurance since its expansion to insurance policies on 5… [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
The Crown can then rebut this presumption for the purposes of the analysis under the curative proviso in s. 686(1)(b)(iv). [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
by Achim Czubaiko, Research Fellow („Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter“) and PhD Candidate, supported by the German Scholarship Foundation, Institute for German and International Civil Procedural Law, University of Bonn. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Michael Chatzipanagiotis
Nonetheless, the ECJ has also clarified that national courts, in carrying out that obligation, should inform the consumer of the consequences of the potential unfairness of the term, namely that the term is invalid and that such invalidity may affect the validity of the whole contract under Article 6(1) UCTD (C-269/19 Banca B., para. 29). [read post]
16 May 2024, 4:45 pm by John Gotaskie
In fact, there are three key takeaways in Smith v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am by Evangelina Cantu
Green owns several houses in the state, real estate ownership doesn’t automatically equate to domicile, so financial obligations related to Houses A, B, and C do not mean that Mr. [read post]