Search for: "C. COAKLEY"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
[Serial-blogging my recent article in the Journal of Free Speech Law] Previously, I blogged the abstract, introduction, and Part I of my new article, Taxing Nudity: Discriminatory Taxes, Secondary Effects, and Tiers of Scrutiny, which has just been published in the Journal of Free Speech Law. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Coakley (2014). [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:27 am
Coakley (2014). [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:11 am
" McCullen Coakley, 573 U.S. 464, 479 (2014)(citations omitted). [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 7:57 am
Coakley (2014), the Court struck down a 35-foot buffer zone outside a clinic in part because [T]he zones … compromise petitioners' ability to initiate the close, personal conversations that they view as essential to "sidewalk counseling. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 5:29 pm
Coakley (2014), the Court struck down a 35-foot buffer zone outside a clinic in part because [T]he zones … compromise petitioners' ability to initiate the close, personal conversations that they view as essential to "sidewalk counseling. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
Coakley, the Court held that an ordinance didn't become viewpoint-based even when it restricted only speech outside abortion clinics, and thus obviously affected one viewpoint more than others: It is true, of course, that by limiting the buffer zones to abortion clinics, the Act has the "inevitable effect" of restricting abortion-related speech more than speech on other subjects. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
[The Pennsylvania Supreme Court 5-2 majority concludes that the injunction is "content-neutral," quite erroneously, I think.] [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Thomas C. [read post]
22 May 2020, 9:56 am
The ACLU just filed its motion for a preliminary injunction in this case, which I blogged about Wednesday. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:05 pm
The Appellate Court held—in my view, correctly—that this provision violates the First Amendment: "[C]ontent-based laws, which target speech based on its communicative content, are presumed to be invalid. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
Skover is the Fredric C. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
Coakley,––– U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
2016 was another big year in anti-SLAPP litigation – with the Appeals Court issuing a slew of Rule 1:28 decisions, the Supreme Judicial Court granting Direct or Further Appellate Review to consider issues ranging from the proper procedure for appealing the allowance of an anti-SLAPP motion to whether theDuracraft Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
2016 was another big year in anti-SLAPP litigation – with the Appeals Court issuing a slew of Rule 1:28 decisions, the Supreme Judicial Court granting Direct or Further Appellate Review to consider issues ranging from the proper procedure for appealing the allowance of an anti-SLAPP motion to whether the Duracraft Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
2016 was another big year in anti-SLAPP litigation – with the Appeals Court issuing a slew of Rule 1:28 decisions, the Supreme Judicial Court granting Direct or Further Appellate Review to consider issues ranging from the proper procedure for appealing the allowance of an anti-SLAPP motion to whether the Duracraft Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
This post examines an opinion from the Supreme Court of North Carolina: State of North Carolina v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:17 pm
IV, § 7(c)(1); see also Cal. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 2:41 pm
Rory Coakley, of Coakley Realty, said he’s seen an uptick in the number of well-located suburban homes that have reached the end of their useful lives — in terms of functionality, missing amenities and size — ... [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:25 am
Coakley, 134 S.Ct. 2518 (2014). [read post]
