Search for: "C. L. Johnson"
Results 1 - 20
of 918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2024, 12:03 pm
Richard L. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Johnson dismissed most of Assange’s legal arguments but said that unless “satisfactory” assurances were given by the US, he would be able to bring an appeal on three grounds. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:38 am
Johnson). [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First and foremost, the Johnson Ministry was dedicated to re-access the Lugano Convention[23] which extended the Brussels regime to certain Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA)/European Economic Area (EEA) in its own right.[24] Given the strong resentments Brexiteers showed against the CJEU during their campaign this move is not without a certain irony, as its case law is also crucial to the uniform interpretation of the Lugano Convention.[25] Whereas Switzerland,… [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:09 am
Jostad, Derek C. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Johnson; (4) Jesus Land: A Memoir by Julia Scheeres; and (5) Red Hood by Elana K. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Johnson; (4) Jesus Land: A Memoir by Julia Scheeres; and (5) Red Hood by Elana K. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 7:06 am
Johnson delivered opening remarks at the FIA L&C Panel by emphasizing the significance of ongoing dialogues about the impact of emerging technologies like generative AI on financial markets. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers are actively looking for plaintiffs who are participants in employer-sponsored plans, particularly following the recent court decision regarding Johnson & Johnson’s healthcare plan. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
After an appeals court decision gave Special Counsel Jack L. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:46 am
Johnson). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Daniel L. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
& C. 4th 251, 257 (2003), or that the TV program Born Innocent led some underage viewers to sexually attack a small child in copying a scene shown on the program, Olivia N. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
National/Federal The Quiet Way Democrats Hope to Expand Their Power at the State Level DNyuz – Nick Corasaniti (New York Times) | Published: 2/20/2024 Locked out of power on the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
Miller (1939), Johnson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:19 pm
Thereafter in Johnson v. [read post]
