Search for: "CCH II, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2019, 3:48 pm by Joy Waltemath
Although the arbitration agreement didn’t explicitly prohibit employees from filing charges with the Board, when reasonably interpreted, it restricted the filing of charges and interfered with employees’ Section 7 rights (Prime Healthcare Paradise Valley, LLC, June 18, 2019). [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 7:26 am by Joy Waltemath
While Judge Silberman was in full agreement with the court’s reasoning here, he wrote separately to contest the reasonableness of the Board’s view expressed in Piggly Wiggly Midwest, LLC . [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:51 pm by Howard Knopf
     The US Court’s stance on contributory infringement is consistent with the Supreme Court of Canada’s position on “authorization” in the 2004 decision in CCH Canadian v Law Society of Upper Canada, in which the SCC held that:…a person does not authorize infringement by authorizing the mere use of equipment that could be used to infringe copyright. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am by Kathy Kapusta
In case you missed Employment Law Daily’s in-depth coverage, here’s a recap of just some of the key developments in the L&E community for June 2018. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:40 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
District Court for the District of Columbia applied the Lone Steer standard to an OFCCP compliance evaluation dispute in its November 2011 decision in United Space Alliance, LLC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
The state high court said the agency erred in finding it dispositive that they did not actually provide services to other companies, despite ample evidence that they had independent business enterprises (Southwest Appraisal Group, LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
It also noted that a failure to report a Category II or Category III violation would itself be a Category II violation. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 6:31 am by Joy Waltemath
Granting the company’s petition for review, the appeals court vacated in large part an administrative law judge’s order imposing a $226,270 fine for its failure to properly review the employment verification forms for 242 employees (Employer Solutions Staffing Group II, LLC, August 11, 2016, Southwick, L.). [read post]