Search for: "CERTIFIED CAPITAL APPELLATE DEFENSE, All" Results 1 - 20 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 6:45 am by Evangelina Cantu
An article prepared by the Environmental Defense Fund outlines the history of the waiver battles which led to the April 9, 2024, decision of a three-judge panel of the D.C. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The G&T test, plaintiffs assert, disproportionately benefits "privileged" white students and their "in-the-know" parents, who have the "navigational capital" to understand the admissions process and the economic capital to pay for expensive test preparation. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The G&T test, plaintiffs assert, disproportionately benefits "privileged" white students and their "in-the-know" parents, who have the "navigational capital" to understand the admissions process and the economic capital to pay for expensive test preparation. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Voting rights advocates view the decisions as a threat to the guarantee all eligible voters can cast ballots and people of color will get an equal say. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 5:31 am by Mary Mayer
Then, an opportunity came along to work for the County Public Defender’s Office, defending people in misdemeanor, felony, and now the only paralegal in the office on capital cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
On January 6, 2021, the gun manufacturer, Daniel Defense contributed $100,000 to the super PAC. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:45 pm by Amy Howe
A California appeals court rejected the hospital’s defense, pointing to the Supreme Court’s decision in Smith. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In all three cases, the courts held the federal forum provisions were enforceable under California law. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
Thank goodness we all get a month off now. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm by Lynn McDonough
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rule that requires patients to access the abortion pill mifepristone only by appearing in person at a certified health care provider. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:35 am by Peter Mahler
The estate obtained a stay of enforcement of the judgment pending its appeal to the Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:26 am by Brittany Williams
At the end of all the evidence, defense counsel renewed the motion to dismiss, asserting that there was no physical evidence. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
All three contracts were still active on the day she appeared with her husband on an official business trip. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am by Erin Connell
Writing for the majority, Judge Morgan Christen first concludes that the EPA’s fourth “catch-alldefense of a “factor other than sex” must be job-related. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am by Erin Connell
Writing for the majority, Judge Morgan Christen first concludes that the EPA’s fourth “catch-alldefense of a “factor other than sex” must be job-related. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Business Groups Try to Avoid Partisan Crossfire The Hill – Alex Gangitano | Published: 2/11/2020 Business groups are facing a new challenge as they look to advance their agendas in an increasingly polarized Washington and ahead of a contentious presidential election. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
@The Appellate Division observed that the ICPC, codified in Social Services Law '374Ba, is a statutory agreement with the express purpose of fostering cooperation and communication between all 50 states so that children requiring placement in another state Ashall receive the maximum opportunity to be placed in a suitable environment and with persons or institutions having appropriate qualifications and facilities to provide a necessary and desirable degree and type of… [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am by MOTP
While affirming summary judgment for the bank because its claim was not barred under the four-year SOL, the Court reaffirmed that a blanket contractual waiver of all statute-of-limitations defenses is against public policy in Texas and therefore unenforceable. [read post]