Search for: "CITY OF OAK PARK V OAK PARK PUBLIC SAFETY"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
County of Mono v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
For years the NRA Foundation has disclosed all its grants, including the amounts, in its annual reports and public filings. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
” Traffic Safety The Town specifically objected to the EIR’s determination that the project’s impacts on traffic safety in neighborhoods in the Town of Tiburon could be mitigated to a less-than-significant level by adopting certain mitigation measures. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:52 am
At the Oaks Picnic Area and East Fork Day Use Parking trailhead, there are a total of 48 designated parking spaces (with paved area and delineations), while the remaining parking occurs in undesignated areas and road shoulders. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:01 am
Like the City of Sacramento Ordinance, the County Ordinance contains two main thrusts: (1) employee safety protocols and (2) additional paid sick leave requirements. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 5:02 am
Village of Twin Oaks (8th Cir. 2017) (applying First Amendment analysis to ordinance regulating commercial activity, including photography, in a public park). [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 10:56 am
(Citing, e.g., Rich v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:00 am
Pekin Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:00 am
Pekin Insurance Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of San Diego v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:52 am
Kreisman Law Offices has been handling litigation matters for individuals and families for more than 38 years in and around Chicago, Cook County and its surrounding areas, including Prospect Heights, Mount Prospect, Elmwood Park, Forest Park, Berwyn, Joliet, Waukegan, Alsip, Dolton, Blue Island, Calumet City, Evergreen Park, Robbins, Crestwood, Midlothian, Oak Forest, Palos Hills and Bridgeview, Ill. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City of San Diego v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Newhall Ranch Specific Plan (the specific plan) On May 27, 2003, the County of Los Angeles approved the Newhall Ranch “specific plan” that includes a broad range of residential, mixed-use and non-residential land uses within five villages, allowing for up to 21,308 dwelling units (including 423 second units), 629 acres of mixed-use development, 67 acres of commercial uses, 249 acres of business park land uses, 37 acres of visitor-serving uses, 1,014 acres of open space,… [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm
City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) and Union Oil Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
EIRs: PUBLIC SERVICES/RECREATION IMPACTS City of Hayward v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am
EIR ADEQUACY: LEAD AGENCY NOT REQUIRED TO MITIGATE PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICE IMPACTS; PROGRAMMATIC DOCUMENT WAS NOT REQUIRED TO STUDY NEIGHBORHOOD STREET IMPACTS; INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT “NO-IMPACT” FINDINGS TO PARKS ***City of Hayward v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:51 am
The Chicago and Oak Park laws at issue said pretty much what the N.Y. and N.Y.C. laws do (actually, N.Y.C. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 pm
Child protection (including trigger locks and storage requirements) In a brief submitted during the McDonald litigation, the City of Chicago and the Village of Oak Park expressed concern that incorporation would prompt a challenge to – and possible defeat of – regulations that protect children. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
That's down seven percent from the same month in 2008: period current year ago change 2008-10 826 959 -14% 2008-11 651 777 -16% 2008-12 839 921 -9% 2009-01 945 1200 -21% 2009-02 831 951 -13% 2009-03 954 1001 -5% 2009-04 886 980 -10% 2009-05 866 940 -8% 2009-06 927 920 1% 2009-07 840 908 -7% TOTAL 8565 9557 -10% Notes This data is taken from Massachusetts public records and was correct at the time of publishing. [read post]
