Search for: "CLARK et al v. CLARK et al" Results 1 - 20 of 533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Morgan Kousser, Emeritus, California Institute of Technology, have signed a Historians’ Amicus Brief in Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 8:08 am by Unreported Opinions
LINDA (LYNN) DIANE WALLIS, ET AL. appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Silja Voeneky, et. al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence:  Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2022). 82. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am by Norman L. Eisen
Donald Trump, et al. (23SC188947)* GA (Meadows): The State of Georgia v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered:June 22, 2023 535052 In the Matter of Local 32 International Association of Firefighters, AFL-CIO, Utica Professional Firefighters Association, Appellant, vNew York State Public Employment Relations Board et al., Respondents. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered:June 22, 2023 535052 In the Matter of Local 32 International Association of Firefighters, AFL-CIO, Utica Professional Firefighters Association, Appellant, vNew York State Public Employment Relations Board et al., Respondents. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 19 and 20 June 2023 Steyn J heard the harassment case of Clarke v Rose. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 12:18 pm by Tim K. Garrett and Maja Hartzell
On May 19, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its split opinion in Clark, et al. v. [read post]