Search for: "CLIFT v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2011, 2:02 am by sally
Clift v Slough Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1171; [2010] WLR (D) 343 “Where a public authority had widely disclosed information about a person who had been in contact with its staff, both stating that she had been placed on its violent persons register and enclosing the entry itself, it was relevant, when looking to the applicability of qualified privilege, to have regard to the art 8 Convention rights of the person so identified and also to look to the… [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Just before the Christmas break, however, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Clift v Slough Borough Council ([2010] EWCA Civ 1171). [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Mr Kelleher had circulated an email to 54 individuals stating: “I have requested that Jane Clift’s name be added to the register of violent persons following repeated threats of violence towards a member of staff. [read post]
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court held that they should depart from the decision in R (Clift) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 1 AC 484. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by INFORRM
In the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) Nicol J held that a Government Press Release  which meant that the claimant,  Dr Salman Butt, was an extremist hate speaker constituted a statement of opinion, not of fact. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 3:22 am
”Gratto attempted to avoid this general rule by contending that a public employee who is involuntarily terminated, is constitutionally entitled to receive the cash value of unused vacation days, citing a Fourth Department decision, Clift v City of Syracuse, 45 AD2d 596 in support of his theory. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:46 am
In May v Ballston Spa Central School District, 170 AD2d 920, the court was asked to determine the right of an employee to the cash value of his or her accrued, but unused, vacation time in a situation where the employer denied the employee the opportunity to use such credits during his or her period of employment and the employee is then terminated.In finding in favor of May, the Appellate Division considered two cases: Hess v Board of Education, 41 AD2d 151 and Clift… [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:52 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty To Animals v Sharp & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1474 (21 December 2010) Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 (21 December 2010) Francis, R (on the application of) v West Midlands Probation Board [2010] EWCA Civ 1470 (21 December 2010) Safeway Stores Ltd & Ors v Twigger & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1472 (21 December 2010) … [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:20 am by INFORRM
Publications of defamatory allegations by the police have been considered pre-HRA, but last year’s case of Clift v Slough Borough Council ([2010] EWCA Civ 1484) surveyed the qualified privilege landscape in relation to the duties of public authorities under s6 of the HRA, and claimants’ Article 8 right to reputation. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:42 am by Jocelyn Hutton
  The second two appeals, R (Haney) v The Secretary of State for Justice and R (Kaiyam) v The Secretary of State for Justice will decide whether a delay in transferring the appellants to open prisons violated their rights under ECHR, arts 5 and 14 and whether the Court should depart from the precedent in R (James & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKHL 22 and R (Clift & Ors) v Secretary of State… [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice was heard on 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
27 May 2016, 1:00 am by Liam MacLean, Shepherd and Wedderburn
  It noted that the House of Lords (in R (Clift) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL 54) had concluded that being treated differently due to one’s status as a prisoner did not come within the ambit of Article 14 discrimination. [read post]