Search for: "COST v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,005
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2024, 7:30 am
In this lawsuit, the industry groups note that, “Congress has provided for automatic indexing in numerous other statutes, such as the cost of living increases for Social Security benefits. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
To qualify for ADR, a TRS member must show that their disability resulted from an "accident" sustained in the performance of their duties (see Retirement and Social Security Law § 605 [f]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 13-551). [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
To qualify for ADR, a TRS member must show that their disability resulted from an "accident" sustained in the performance of their duties (see Retirement and Social Security Law § 605 [f]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 13-551). [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
On Tuesday 14 May 2024 there was an application for security for costs in the case of Sikhs for Justice and another v Ranger KB-2022-004490. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
Insurance/Administrative Law: SABS; Standard of ReviewYatar v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Respondents appeal.Initially, petitioners move to strike a footnote from respondents' reply brief on the ground that it contains matters that are outside the scope of the administrative record. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Respondents appeal.Initially, petitioners move to strike a footnote from respondents' reply brief on the ground that it contains matters that are outside the scope of the administrative record. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
But trouble looms with respect to social security and retirement savings. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am
L. 112-40), which created section 303(a)(11) of the Social Security Act (“SSA”) (42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm
By: Colleen V. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am
Claimants affected by a decision of this kind which was taken before the decision in JA will be particularly likely to need specialist advice, because of the potential effects of what social security lawyers call the ‘anti test-case rule’. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
” The court concluded that these types of statements “undoubtedly risk impeding the orderly administration” of the court, with no less restrictive means to guard against that risk short of a limited gag order. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Merrill v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
At present, the administrative fee is 5%. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
At present, the administrative fee is 5%. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:41 am
The Fifth Circuit held that Texas demonstrated injury in fact because “DAPA would enable at lest 500,000 illegal aliens in Texas” and the extended DACA program would also cause “pocketbook injuries on the State in the form of healthcare, education, and social service costs. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
