Search for: "CVS Does, 1-20" Results 1 - 20 of 1,354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Key Takeaway Unlike the 2016 rules, the Final Rule does not contain a specific, representation-based exception from fiduciary advice for interactions with sophisticated counterparties like other advice fiduciaries. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am by itars sis
”[19] In addition to Meta and OpenAI, other AI companies such as Google[20] and Nvidia[21] have also refrained from disclosing their training datasets and their content over time. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
If the case does not settle, the court is likely to grapple with the issue of valuation of the damaged pieces. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm by Michael Lowe
 The McClinton case was a prime example of injustice at work:  there, despite a recommended range of 5-6 years under the USSG on the crime of robbing a CVS Pharmacy, acquitted conduct involving a related murder charge resulted in an enhanced sentence of 20 years imprisonment. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Not because of what they create but because their CV doesn’t scream artist with a pedigree from a world-class art school. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And it is incumbent on each of us to make sure it does not come to pass and that investors are not harmed by noncompliance with the securities laws when it comes to this new technology. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
When the Supreme Court decided the Daubert case in June 1993, two recent verdicts in silicone-gel breast implant cases were fresh in memory.[1] The verdicts were large by the standards of the time, and the evidence presented for the claims that silicone caused autoimmune disease was extremely weak. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
After all, every lawyer here knows what the test is to determine whether a crypto asset was offered and sold as an “investment contract,” and therefore a security: it’s the Howey test.[1] It’s not the “essential ingredients” test,[2] or the Beanie Baby test,[3] or some other test that industry folks might like to create for themselves. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 11:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., 2024 WL 1282368, No. 15-CV-2995(EK)(JAM), 16-CV-1153(EK)(JAM), 17-CV-0093(EK)(JAM) (E.D.N.Y. [read post]