Search for: "Cable Tv Company v. Federal Communications Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm by Daphne Keller
Their initial challenges to the Texas and Florida laws also raised two other arguments, under the Dormant Commerce Clause and the federal immunity statute known as Section 230. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
  That could be accomplished through law and regulation, of course, and there are examples in the law of ways in which such laws balance incentives and interests, e.g., compulsory licensing schemes for cable TV stations retransmitting copyrighted content. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by Mark MacCarthy
And it barely mentions the actual finding of the Turner case, which required cable carriage of local broadcast signals even though these stations were technically able to reach the public using the frequencies assigned to them by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am by David Greene
  The Fairness Doctrine was a Federal Communications Commission rule that imposed “fair” reporting requirements on radio and television broadcasters. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
The Federal Communications Commission appears to have ignored President Trump’s executive order requiring it to “propose regulations to clarify” the meaning of Section 230. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am by Cory Doctorow
Last month, the Mexican Congress passed amendments to the Federal Copyright Law and the Federal Criminal Code, notionally to comply with the country's treaty obligations under Donald Trump's USMCA, the successor to NAFTA. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:23 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Federal Communications Commission The FCC held open meetings on July 16 and August 6, respectively. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm by Kit Walsh
Congress was thinking about people ripping DVDs to infringe movies or descrambling cable channels without paying, but the law it passed goes much, much farther. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:00 am by FHH Law
June 15, 2020 Significantly Viewed Local TV Stations – Reply Comments are due concerning the FCC’s NPRM examining whether to update the methodology for determining whether a TV broadcast station is “significantly viewed” in a community outside of its local television market and thus may be treated as a local station in that community and permitted under FCC rules to be carried by cable systems and satellite operators. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:00 am by FHH Law
May 14, 2020 Significantly Viewed Local TV Stations – Comments are due with regard to the FCC’s NPRM examining whether to update the methodology for determining whether a TV broadcast station is “significantly viewed” in a community outside of its local television market and thus may be treated as a local station in that community and permitted under FCC rules to be carried by cable systems and satellite operators. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:37 am by Barry Sookman
Our Federal Court recently granted an injunction in Bell Canada v. 1326030 Ontario Inc. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/UvcaPA7cwn -> Jewish community of Warsaw sues Polish Jewish history museum over copyright infringement https://t.co/sB1E2aL4AL -> Copyright shake-up: What you see and hear could be about to change https://t.co/ijgeD2vfXd -> PayPal files TM infringement against Paytm, says similar colour scheme used in logo https://t.co/fk2uPoeAN9 -> Jailing of Everton DJ was 'milestone' in fight against piracy says music industry https://t.co/Y0olfpyqQP -> Trump on… [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:36 pm by Mitch Stoltz
The Federal Communications Commission has a plan to bring much-needed competition and consumer choice to the market for set-top boxes and television-viewing apps. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:36 pm by Mitch Stoltz
The Federal Communications Commission has proposed to break cable and satellite TV companies’ monopoly over the hardware and software used by their subscribers. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
  A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:47 am by David Oxenford
Both Courts focused on the language of Section 111 which defines a cable system as follows: A “cable system” is a facility, located in any State, territory, trust territory, or possession of the United States, that in whole or in part receives signals transmitted or programs broadcast by one or more television broadcast stations licensed by the Federal Communications Commission, and makes secondary transmissions of such signals or programs by… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
Judge Kimball ruled that Aereo's retransmission of video signals was "indistinguishable from a cable company. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:25 am
Aero is arguing that, as the Supreme Court thought that it acted like a cable system and should be treated in the same manner as cable system for all purposes, it should also be entitled to carry the signals of TV stations pursuant to the statutory licence granted to cable systems by section 111 of the US Copyright Act.Sanna Wolk (Associate Professor at University of Uppsala, Sweden and co-chair of AIPPI’s copyright committee) compared the US position with… [read post]