Search for: "California v. Arizona" Results 1 - 20 of 1,998
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2025, 1:06 pm by NARF
Protection or indifference: Why the Arizona v. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
”[4] Canada’s statute is an updated version of what have been called “constituency statutes” in the United States, which explicitly expand the fiduciary duties of corporate managers and directors “beyond shareholders” but do not usually include “the environment” among allowable factors, except in Arizona and Texas.[5] Approximately two-thirds of U.S. states have constituency statutes, but not yet, importantly, the great corporate law state of… [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 12:00 am by John Coyle
Vázquez (Georgetown University Law Center) Christopher A. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 8:16 am by Above the Law
The Arizona Supreme Court on Thursday granted the accounting giant final approval to obtain a license to create its own firm, KPMG Law. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 3:15 am by Sasha Volokh
California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971),] was directed at breaches of the peace, but as applied to [petitioner] the conduct triggering coverage under the statute consists of communicating a message. [read post]
23 Feb 2025, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
” Relevant Supreme Court cases: Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 12:15 pm by Angie Sanchez
Law Office: 1 year; Arizona Bar License  Salary: 110,000 – 140,000 Closes: 03/01/2025 https://www.zwfirm.com/careers 12 Associate Attorney Mshkawzi Law, LLP, Grand Rapid [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 12:26 pm by Just Security
Doe; Brazilian Worker Center, Inc; La Colaborativa v. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 5:34 am by Kalvis Golde
City of Stockton, California 24-427Issues: (1) Whether this court should overrule McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 12:42 pm by Mark Nevitt
 I’m skeptical that the Ninth Circuit, which has federal jurisdiction over challenges in California and Arizona, will fully disregard the statutory text and defer to the president on this matter. [read post]