Search for: "California v. Curry" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Republican politicians have embraced immigration as a potent political issue. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 4:02 am by SHG
This sounds remarkably like the “actual malice” standard of Times v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 5:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To state a claim for fraudulent inducement, a plaintiff must show that the defendant’s misrepresentation or concealment induced the plaintiff to enter into the transaction and directly caused the plaintiff to suffer a loss (Meyercord v Curry, 38 AD3d 315, 316 [1st Dept 2007]). [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
He has made a career as a political weathervane, shifting and shaping positions to curry favor with whoever is ascendant at the moment. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
Curry, 79, of Fort Worth, died January 21, 2021. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 10:40 am by Jeremy T. Rosenblum and James Kim
As previously reported, the OCC recently adopted a final rule (the “Madden fix”) designed to resolve the legal uncertainty created by the Second Circuit’s decision in Madden v. [read post]
23 May 2020, 3:35 pm
To hold otherwise -- as the high courts in New York, California, Connecticut, Georgia and several other States have done -- is not only to misread Jones v. [read post]
23 May 2020, 3:35 pm
To hold otherwise -- as the high courts in New York, California, Connecticut, Georgia and several other States have done -- is not only to misread Jones v. [read post]