Search for: "California v. Mullins"
Results 1 - 20
of 229
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
Please contact your Sheppard Mullin attorney for additional information. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:00 am
For companies doing business in California, it’s important to be aware of the January 18, 2024 California Supreme Court decision in Estrada v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 5:10 pm
See Banks v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
The idea that investors might choose to consider certain environmental, social, and governance factors when deciding whether to buy shares of a company—a concept commonly known as ESG—continues to gain popularity with trillions of dollars currently held in investment funds that take into account ESG principles. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:51 pm
As we wrote about previously here, in October 2022, the Sixth District of the California Court of Appeal in Camp v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 2:02 pm
SB 118 is the swift legislative response to the March 2022 decision in Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:02 am
Recently, in Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Grants Rehearing on California Law Banning Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements
16 Sep 2022, 10:19 am
Please contact your Sheppard Mullin attorney contact for additional information. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:55 pm
"] From Mahendra v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:57 am
The California Court of Appeal in Meda v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 8:49 pm
Davila of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted IPCom's December 2021 motion to dismiss an amended complaint by Lenovo and its Motorola Mobility subsidiary that alleged breach of contract, monopolization in violation of U.S. antitrust law (Sherman Act Sec. 2), and sought a declaratory judgment of non-infringement of two IPCom patents. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 10:19 am
As just one example (there are a couple dozen such zingers in the opinion): “Meta cites Sheppard, Mullin for the proposition that contracts may only be invalidated as contrary to public policy where they implicate express law, which is the opposite of what that case says. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:25 pm
In Crest v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm
Counsel for the West Midlands Police, James Lewis QC, told the Old Bailey that Mullin refuses to identify the bomber, referred to as AB. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 18 February 2022, judgement was given in favour of the claimants in the defamation claim Thunder Studios Inc (California) v Kazal (No 12) [2022] FCA 110. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:28 pm
*Mark Ross is an attorney in Sheppard Mullin’s San Francisco office. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
Ballard, 94, of Santa Rosa, California, died January 28, 2021. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 00874-21 Mullins v telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 00239-21 Treatz SHEFF LTD T/A v thestar.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 28382-20 Asaf v Midlothian Advertiser, 1 Accuracy (2019) 2 Privacy (2019) 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2019) 12 Discrimination (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 11743-20 Sharp… [read post]
