Search for: "Camp v. State of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 378
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 3:00 am
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:44 am
California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962) (holding that a state may not criminalize the status of being a drug addict), and conduct, which generally may be punished. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
McCabe (concluding that the classification of marijuana was not rational); State v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:39 pm
But internal calls are growing for the police chief to step aside as University of California President Michael V. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
But students and faculty have no special or greater entitlement to protest state action or institutional decisions than anyone else in this country. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:45 pm
UC President Michael V. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:26 pm
The case, Grants Pass v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm
California, holding that the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment prohibited the state from making it a crime simply to be a drug addict in California, even if there was no proof that the defendant had ever used drugs in the state. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:59 am
California, in which the Supreme Court held that laws imposing penalties on people for narcotics addiction violated the Eighth Amendment because they punished a state of being, not a specific action, like drug possession or sale. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
In 1962, in Robinson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:21 am
Its decision could have a big impact on states with large homeless populations like California, Oregon, and Arizona. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm
By banning the enforcement of anti-camping ordinances throughout the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit—which includes (among others) the states of Washington, Oregon, California, and Arizona—that court has overseen the proliferation of homeless encampments in Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix, and countless other cities. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
” Although the terms of the Insurrection Act suggested that the militias would be federalized when civilian authorities were overwhelmed, in 1827 the Supreme Court indicated, in a case called Martin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm
Saluskin (Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) California v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
” In Martin v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court agreed to review Johnson v. [read post]
