Search for: "Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
To be sure, music licensing has not been without its controversies, but by that token there's no reason to think aspects of the music licensing model that don't work well would necessarily need to be recreated here. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am by Eric Goldman
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 580-81 (1994) (“Parody needs to mimic an original to make its point”). [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am by centerforartlaw
When the music video emerged in the 1980s as a novel method for communicating music to the public, it was hailed as a new medium of representative art. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v Lynn Goldsmith concerned the aforementioned iconic art of Andy Warhol, namely his lithographs of the music artist Prince. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v Lynn Goldsmith concerned the aforementioned iconic art of Andy Warhol, namely his lithographs of the music artist Prince. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:20 am by Terry Hart
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 580-581 (1994). [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., “[p]arody's humor . . . necessarily springs from recognizable allusion to its object through distorted imitation. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., which involved a lawsuit alleging that 2 Live Crew’s version of Roy Orbison’s song “Oh, Pretty Woman” infringed the copyright. [read post]