Search for: "Can-Do Promotions, Inc. v. Hammer"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
The court hammers the definition of social media platform again, especially the fact that it’s riddled with exceptions: Act 689’s definitions and exemptions do seem to indicate that the State has selected a few platforms for regulation while ignoring all the rest. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
It is only in the complex interplay of these layers of law, principle, regulation, and guidance described above, that one can begin to see the outline of the normative cage within which human rights can be understood and practiced by CSOEs. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 8:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 7:49 am
For example, if Salesforce can’t actually engage in content moderation of Backpage’s ads (either because it lacks the technical capacity or the contract didn’t permit it), then what was Salesforce supposed to do to mitigate the harms? [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 7:47 am
WRB, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:43 am
" Emerson can doubtlessly penalize discriminatory conduct or speech amounting to discriminatory harassment. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 10:08 am
The IAP can still invoke 512(a), and I expect it will. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
We cannot imagine a world in which men do not try to rape, only one in which women can lock their doors against rapists.Conversations at the Davis Center this year have convinced me that these limits are one of law’s constitutive dilemmas. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:27 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
Cyber-attacks involving the theft of intellectual property can result in a company’s immediate or even permanent loss of revenue and reputation; cyber-attacks involving denial of services (such as a website being shut down by nefarious hackers) can disrupt or forever diminish consumer or customer confidence; cyber-attacks involving exfiltration of private company emails can have a tumultuous impact upon senior management and create an international uproar;… [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:45 am
But see United We Stand Am., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
Google, Inc., No. 12-57302 (9th Cir. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am
What’s a contractor to do? [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 6:24 pm
However, records subpoenaed from eBay, Inc. indicate that she sold Coach items from her account. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:41 am
Do we have to? [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
can a belt buckle be considered a substance?). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:10 pm
However, records subpoenaed from eBay, Inc. indicate that she sold Coach items from her account. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:45 pm
eBay Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
Bramalea California, Inc. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1, 13-14, 17 (Foxgate).) [read post]