Search for: "Canadian Pacific Railway Limited"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
More specifically, the employer, Canadian Pacific Railways, had amended its policy with respect to disclosure of employee health and medical information. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
More specifically, the employer, Canadian Pacific Railways, had amended its policy with respect to disclosure of employee health and medical information. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:40 pm
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, 2015 ONCA 592 at paras 3 and 40-43; D’Souza v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:21 am
Nothing prevents it, except threat actors’ limited patience, motivation, and resources, which—as we’ve clearly just seen—are sometimes not so limited after all. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:37 am
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal and Student-at-Law, First Reference Editor In Canadian Pacific Railway v United Steelworkers – TC Local 1976 (“Canadian Pacific”), an employer’s dismissal of an employee who committed a safety infraction while intoxicated with cannabis was upheld as reasonable. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 10:42 pm
TCI Fund Management Limited (TCI) recently successfully submitted a climate change-related shareholder proposal (the Proposal) to Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP) to be voted on at CP’s upcoming 2021 annual general meeting of shareholders. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 10:42 pm
TCI Fund Management Limited (TCI) recently successfully submitted a climate change-related shareholder proposal (the Proposal) to Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP) to be voted on at CP’s upcoming 2021 annual general meeting of shareholders. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 12:07 pm
The five categories for economic loss recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada in Canadian National Railway Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am
Macdonald sought prorogation to avoid a committee’s investigation of corruption related to the proposed Pacific Railway. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
So as the lawsuit opens, the plaintiff has no plantation, no railway, and no supplies. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
So as the lawsuit opens, the plaintiff has no plantation, no railway, and no supplies. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
So as the lawsuit opens, the plaintiff has no plantation, no railway, and no supplies. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
When Canadian Courts Cite the Major Philosophers: Who Cites Whom in Canadian Caselaw Queen’s University Legal Research Paper No. 2017-090; CLLR 42:2 Nancy McCormack is an Associate Professor and Law Librarian at Queen’s University. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 5:10 am
Recent attacks on connected railways have struck South Korea, the U.K. rail system, Deutsche Bahn and the Canadian Pacific Railway. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:18 am
Wisconsin Central and the two other petitioners, all wholly owned subsidiaries of Canadian National Railway Co., have been issuing stock options to their employees since the mid-1990s. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 6:00 am
On January 18, 2017, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited announced that Mr. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 7:22 am
Canadian Pacific Railway, [1973] S.C.R. 654, the Supreme Court of Canada had decided that CPP payments were deductible in calculating monies due under the Families’ Compensation Act of British Columbia. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 6:09 am
A “Successful” Case of Activism at the Canadian Pacific Railway: Lessons in Corporate Governance Posted by Yvan Allaire and François Dauphin, IGOPP and UQAM, on Friday, December 23, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Canada, Hedge funds, Information asymmetries, Information environment, International governance, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Pershing Square, Proxy fights, Shareholder activism, Target firms U.K. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
These are some of the findings of Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP’s “Canadian Proxy Contest Study” released today.Proxy contests have come into the spotlight in recent years, especially with last year’s high-profile Canadian Pacific Railway dispute. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
Inq.); Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. [read post]
