Search for: "Carter v Carter" Results 1 - 20 of 2,862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 11:47 am by Josh Blackman
Carter Phillips, who does not wear a MAGA hat, was just elected as President of the society. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Jackson's 2023 financial disclosure report revealed that she received four concert tickets from Beyoncé Knowles-Carter, valuing about $3,700. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff tries to argue he was singled out for disparate treatment, but the Court of Appeals finds his "comparators" are not really comparators.The case is Carter v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:13 pm
(Though my guess would be that the petitioner, Ishmael Carter, will still be held at the hospital for a long period of time -- perhaps forever -- notwithstanding today's result.) [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:56 am by Family Law
From North Carolina Lawyers Weekly: The trial court did not have a legal basis to order plaintiff to pay child support. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:50 am by Dan Farber
Bumpers Amendment passes Senate, is strongly opposed by Carter Administration, dies in House. 1982. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 9:58 am by Giles Peaker
Lowe v Governors of Sutton’s Hospital In Charterhouse (2024) EWHC 646 (Ch) A High Court appeal of a first instance county court judgment by HHJ Luba KC, which we noted here. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:38 pm by Howard Bashman
Carter Sherman of The Guardian has an article headlined “‘Cruel’: the supreme court could send one-time abortion deserts like Hawaii back in time; States in which abortion is legal but was long inaccessible have benefitted from the FDA’s expansion of a key abortion drug. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
OCA's treatment of its May 27 constructive denial as a final agency determination is inconsistent with its statements notifying petitioner that it had opportunities for further administrative appeals (see Matter of Carter v State of N.Y., Exec. [read post]