Search for: "Carter v. Cox"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
On 22 March 2023, the defendant’s application for summary judgement was dismissed in the case of Frati v Bowen-Carter [2023] EWHC 627 (KB). [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am
Quick links Lucinda Chaplin and William Carter, Lexology: Gender Identity v Gender Beliefs. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm
Cox and O. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 2:53 am
Our previous Trump v Twitter piece explained how s.230 gives both a shield and a sword to online providers like Twitter and Facebook, providing not only (1) that no provider shall be treated as the publisher of information provided by another (thereby protecting providers, as supposed mere platforms, from legal proceedings regarding what has been said by users on those platforms), but also (2) that where a provider does, in good faith, moderate what is published by American users,… [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am
” Never, but apparently, not for long.On June 20 of last year, in Gundy v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
JOpinion Editor’s note: Gary M. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
In determining the appeal ([2018] EWCA Civ 170), Lady Justice Sharp approved Mitting J’s approach to establishing the meaning: “The Judge directed himself explicitly by reference to the well-established principles set out in Jeynes v News Magazines Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 130 (as qualified in Rufus v Elliott [2015] EWCA Civ 121); moreover, since he had merely used the dictionary definitions as a check and no more, his ultimate reasoning was sound. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:15 am
Richardson refused to fire Cox. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
So in Myers v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:37 pm
However, an older Florida Appellate Court decision, Cox v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:37 am
Cox New Jersey Appeals Court Reverses Anti-Harassment Order Based on Emails – E.L. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:15 am
Ricketts too is now “on the radar” in the Family Court, particularly since the case of London Borough of Islington v Al Alas and Wray [2012] EWHC 865 (Fam), which was major news in April 2012 (exactly the time the care proceedings were likely to have been commenced in this case) and really raised the profile of rickets as a potential cause of injuries that might otherwise be thought suspicious. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:49 pm
Both Scarbrough and Cox deny any involvement in downloading or viewing the photographs at issue. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Both Scarbrough and Cox deny any involvement in downloading or viewing the photographs at issue. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
CORE v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ariz. 2013); Carter v. [read post]
